Sport Psychologist vs Therapist: Which Type of Support Do You Need?
- Lewis Parkin

- Jun 12
- 14 min read
Why the Answer Might Not Be What You Think: Understanding the Overlap Between Performance, Wellbeing, and the Person Behind the Athlete

Many people considering psychological support find themselves asking a similar question: do I need a sport psychologist or a therapist?
At first glance, the distinction can seem relatively straightforward. Sport psychologists are often associated with performance, whilst therapists are commonly associated with mental health and emotional wellbeing. Right?
The reality is often far more complex than this simple distinction suggests. If you have found yourself struggling with confidence, anxiety, motivation, burnout, injury, low mood, or simply feeling stuck in some aspect of your sporting or personal life, you may already have asked this question yourself. Understanding the differences, similarities, and areas of overlap between these two forms of support can help you make a more informed decision about the type of support that may be most helpful for you.
From both research and applied practice, we know that effective psychological support is rarely determined by professional titles alone. Factors such as the quality of the working relationship, the practitioner's approach, their area of competence, and the unique needs of the individual often play a significant role in whether support is experienced as helpful.
Whether you are actively looking for support, exploring your options, or simply trying to better understand what different professionals can offer, this article explores a different, evidence-informed perspective that may help you navigate this decision with greater confidence and clarity.
Why This Question Is Harder Than It First Appears
As humans, it is natural to try and understand complex problems by breaking them down into smaller, more manageable parts. In psychology, this is often referred to as a reductionist approach. Whilst this can sometimes oversimplify human experience, it can also be incredibly useful. By identifying specific factors that contribute to a problem, we are often better able to understand it and determine the best ways to offer support.
In many ways, this approach has shaped much of the history of sport psychology. Traditionally, difficulties such as confidence, anxiety, concentration, motivation, or performance under pressure have often been viewed as specific performance-related problems that can be identified and addressed through targeted sport psychological interventions. This way of thinking has undoubtedly contributed to many valuable developments within the field and continues to inform our practice.
However, we work with people, not just athletes, meaning things are often less straightforward than they first appear.
One of the most common reasons athletes seek psychological support is performance anxiety. For example, an athlete may describe experiencing negative thoughts before competition, worrying that "I am not good enough", "I will make mistakes", or feeling convinced that "others will judge my performance." Unsurprisingly, these thoughts can increase anxiety, reduce confidence, and ultimately impact performance.
At first glance, this might appear to be a relatively straightforward sport psychology issue. The athlete experiences performance anxiety, and the goal is to help them manage it more effectively during performance settings.
Yet in practice, situations like this are often situated within a much broader context.
Across my work with a range of clients, I have noticed that athletes frequently present with a performance-focused goal, but this is often connected to other aspects of their life. Imagine, for example, that the same athlete has a difficult relationship with their father, who attends many of their competitions and whose opinion feels particularly important to them. At the same time, they may be trying to balance increasing training demands alongside the pressures of starting a new job. Perhaps they have also recently noticed similar worries appearing in situations outside of sport, such as before a driving test, an important interview, or other situations where they feel evaluated by others.
Suddenly, the question becomes more complicated.
Is this primarily a performance issue? A confidence issue? An anxiety issue? A relationship issue? A response to life stress? Or perhaps some combination of all of these factors?
Whilst there may not be a single correct answer, examples such as this highlight an important point: human experiences rarely fit neatly into the categories we create for them.
This is one of the reasons why the question, "Do I need a sport psychologist or a therapist?" may be harder to answer than it first appears.
What Is a Sport Psychologist and What Is a Therapist?
Part of the difficulty in answering this question lies in the fact that the terms themselves are not always as clear as they first appear.
When people ask whether they need a sport psychologist or a therapist, they are often comparing two broad ideas rather than two clearly defined and mutually exclusive professions. As a result, confusion can arise before we have even begun to think about what type of support may be most helpful.
A sport psychologist is typically a professional trained in the application of psychological theory, research, and practice within sport, exercise, and performance settings. Depending on their role, sport psychologists may work with individuals, teams, coaches, or organisations across a wide range of contexts. Their work can include areas such as confidence, anxiety, motivation, concentration, team dynamics, wellbeing, behaviour change, and performance under pressure.
However, the term 'sport psychology' can encompass a broad range of approaches and ways of working. Some practitioners primarily operate as consultants or educators, teaching evidence-based psychological skills designed to support performance and development. Others may work more collaboratively and reflectively, helping individuals explore the emotional, relational, and personal factors that influence both performance and wellbeing.
The scientific research tells us that sport psychologists often develop distinct professional identities and ways of working throughout their careers. Whilst all registered sport psychologists share a foundation of psychological knowledge and training, they may differ considerably in their theoretical orientation, applied philosophy, and the types of conversations that take place within their work.
The term "therapist" can be equally complex.
Unlike titles such as Sport and Exercise Psychologist, therapist is not a protected professional title in the UK. Instead, it is often used as an umbrella term to describe individuals from a variety of professional backgrounds who provide therapy. This may include counsellors, psychotherapists, counselling
psychologists, clinical psychologists, and practitioners from a range of other therapeutic professions.
Perhaps more helpful than viewing therapy as a profession is to think of it as a process.
The word therapy originates from the Greek word therapeia, meaning healing or attending to. In modern psychological practice, therapy often involves creating a safe and collaborative space in which individuals can explore their thoughts, emotions, behaviours, relationships, and experiences with the aim of developing greater understanding, reducing distress, and facilitating meaningful change.
Importantly, therapy is not simply advice-giving, or telling people what to do. Whilst different therapeutic approaches vary considerably, most share a belief that lasting change often emerges through a process of exploration, reflection, and understanding rather than the delivery of solutions alone.
Some sport psychologists may also possess substantial therapeutic training and may integrate therapeutic approaches into their work. Others may focus more heavily on consultation, education, and performance-focused interventions. Equally, many therapists work with athletes and performers, regularly exploring issues that have a direct impact on confidence, performance, motivation, and wellbeing.
Rather than existing in entirely separate worlds, there is often considerable overlap between sport psychology and therapy. Understanding this overlap is important because therapy itself represents one of the most extensively researched approaches for facilitating psychological change. The question therefore becomes not simply whether someone is a sport psychologist or a therapist, but how they work, what they are trained to do, and whether their approach is appropriate for your particular needs.
Welcome to Humanism
At this point, you may be thinking that all of this sounds a little messy.
Sport psychologists can work therapeutically, therapists can work with athletes, confidence can affect wellbeing, wellbeing can affect performance, and many of the challenges people bring to support seem to overlap with one another.
In many ways, that is exactly the point.
Whilst it can sometimes feel frustrating, the lack of clear boundaries between these experiences often reflects the reality of being human. Human lives are rarely organised into neat categories, and the challenges we face do not always respect the professional labels we create.
Welcome to humanism.
At its simplest, humanism is an approach to psychology that focuses on understanding people as whole human beings rather than collections of symptoms, problems, or performance variables. Rather than asking, "What is wrong with this person?" a humanistic perspective is often more interested in questions such as, "What is this person's experience?" and "How can we better understand the context in which these difficulties have emerged?"
Imagine, for example, that you are struggling with confidence before competition. A reductionist approach might focus on confidence itself, identifying the thoughts, emotions, and behaviours directly related to performance. A humanistic perspective would remain interested in those factors, but may also become curious about your broader experience. What does sport mean to you? How does it connect to your identity? What pressures are you carrying outside of sport? How do you relate to success, failure, criticism, and expectations? Rather than viewing these questions as separate from performance, humanistic approaches often see them as part of the same picture.
This perspective has become increasingly influential within modern sport psychology. In recent years, organisations such as the International Society of Sport Psychology have highlighted the importance of viewing athlete wellbeing and performance as interconnected rather than competing priorities. From this perspective, supporting wellbeing is not necessarily separate from supporting performance. In many cases, the two may influence one another in meaningful ways and cannot be effectively supported in isolation.
This does not mean that every performance issue has deep psychological roots, or that every athlete requires extensive therapeutic exploration. Rather, it encourages us to recognise that athletes are people first. Their sporting experiences exist alongside relationships, work, education, family life, health, identity, and countless other factors that shape how they think, feel, and perform.
For some individuals, being an athlete forms a central part of who they are. Successes and setbacks within sport can therefore feel deeply personal, influencing confidence, self-esteem, relationships, and overall wellbeing. Equally, challenges outside of sport can often find their way into training sessions, competitions, and performance environments.
Perhaps this is why attempts to clearly separate sport psychology from therapy can sometimes feel unsatisfying. The fact that these different forms of support often overlap may not just reflect the professions themselves. It may instead reflect the fact that human experiences are often interconnected and inseperable, making it difficult to place them into a single category.
In other words, the support we need can sometimes be just as complex and unique as the people seeking it.
A Quick Reflection Before reading on, it may be helpful to think about a challenge you are currently experiencing. Perhaps it is anxiety before competition, a loss of confidence around a certain task, difficulties with motivation, stress at work, a relationship challenge, or something you are trying to achieve, but struggling with. Take a moment to write down as many factors as you can think of that may be contributing to that experience. Once you have done this, look back over your list and ask yourself:
For many people, the answer is that their experiences are influenced by a combination of factors rather than a single cause. This does not mean that every challenge requires extensive exploration, nor that performance-focused support cannot be effective. However, it does highlight why deciding between a sport psychologist and a therapist is not always as straightforward as it first appears. |
The Relationship Matters More Than Most People Realise
After this information, you may now be wondering whether any of these distinctions really matter at all.
The answer is yes, but perhaps not in the way many people initially assume.
Training, qualifications, regulation, and professional competence are all important considerations. Different professionals possess different areas of expertise, work within different scopes of practice, and may be better suited to certain difficulties than others. However, decades of psychological research have consistently highlighted another factor that appears to play a significant role in successful outcomes across a range of helping professions: the quality of the relationship itself.
Whether we are discussing sport psychology, counselling, psychotherapy, or however else we wish to label psychological support, one of the most consistent findings in the scientific research is the importance of what is often referred to as the therapeutic alliance. Put simply, this refers to the quality of the relationship between the practitioner and the person seeking support.
We can often ask ourselves:
Do I feel understood?
Do I trust the person I am working with?
Can I speak openly about the things that matter?
Do I feel as though we are working towards shared goals?
Research suggests that these factors can be just as, or even more important than the specific techniques or approaches being used. Whilst different practitioners may draw upon different theories, interventions, and models of practice, meaningful change is often facilitated through a relationship in which individuals feel safe enough to explore difficult experiences, discover existing patterns, and experiment with new ways of thinking or behaving.
This core consideration aligns closely with the humanistic ideas discussed earlier. If people are complex, unique, and shaped by their individual experiences, it makes sense that effective support is unlikely to be delivered through a one-size-fits-all approach. Instead, psychological support often works best when it is responsive to the person sitting in front of us.
This may also help explain why two practitioners with similar qualifications can have very different impacts on different individuals. A practitioner who feels like an excellent fit for one person may feel less helpful for another, not necessarily because either person is wrong, but because therapeutic relationships are unique and personal.
This is something I see repeatedly throughout my own work, as whilst clients often initially seek support for confidence, anxiety, motivation, or performance concerns, the most meaningful moments of progress rarely emerge from a particular 'high-performance technique' alone. More often, they emerge from conversations in which people feel genuinely understood, accepted, and able to explore experiences they may never have spoken about openly before.
Returning to the original question of this article, this may be one reason why deciding between a sport psychologist and a therapist is not always the most useful starting point. Before considering professional labels, it can be equally important to consider how a practitioner works, whether their approach aligns with your needs, and whether they are able to build the kind of relationship that allows meaningful change to occur.
In other words, the question may not simply be, "What is this person's job title?" but also, "Is this someone I can genuinely work with?"
Making Practical Decisions
After exploring the overlap between sport psychology, therapy, performance, and wellbeing, you may feel as though the answer to the original question has become less clear.
In some ways, this is a frustrating but unavoidable part of exploring psychological support.
Throughout this article, I have intentionally challenged the assumption that sport psychology and therapy exist as two entirely separate forms of support. Whilst differences in training, professional identity, and scope of practice certainly exist, the reality is often far more complex. Human experiences rarely arrive neatly packaged as either "performance problems" or "wellbeing problems", and many of the challenges people seek support for naturally extend across both.
It is important to recognise that therapeutic training is not a standard component of all sport psychology pathways. Whilst many sport psychologists pursue additional training and develop strong therapeutic and relational skills throughout their careers, others may work primarily from consultation, educational, or performance-focused frameworks. Neither approach is inherently better, but the key question is whether their way of working aligns with your needs as a person as well as an athlete.
For this reason, it can be helpful to move beyond professional titles and become curious about how a practitioner actually works. While it is never your job to become an expert in psychological competencies, it can be helpful to consider the following questions:
Do they appear interested in understanding you as a whole person?
How do they think about the relationship between performance and wellbeing?
What happens if conversations move beyond sport and into other areas of life?
How do they describe their approach?
Do they appear comfortable exploring uncertainty, complexity, and difficult emotions?
These questions are not only relevant when speaking to sport psychologists, and may be equally valuable when considering counsellors, psychotherapists, counselling psychologists, or other helping professionals as the best source of support.
Regardless of profession, many of the qualities associated with effective therapeutic work remain remarkably consistent and one of the most important factors in determining success. The ability to listen carefully, develop trust, communicate empathy, tolerate complexity, and understand people within the broader context of their lives are valuable skills across all forms of psychological support.
Ultimately, the goal is not necessarily to find the perfect professional title. It is to find someone who has the appropriate training, competence, and personal qualities to understand your unique situation and support you in working towards meaningful change.
Sometimes that person may present as a sport psychologist. Sometimes they may present as a therapist. Sometimes it may be difficult to separate the two.
The question therefore may not be, "Do I need a sport psychologist or a therapist?" but rather, "Who is best placed to help me make sense of my experience and move towards the changes that matter most?"
Key Takeaways
The question of whether you need a sport psychologist or a therapist is often more complex than it first appears. Many of the challenges people seek support for extend across performance, wellbeing, relationships, identity, and everyday life.
Human experiences rarely fit neatly into professional categories. The fact that different forms of support often overlap may tell us more about the complexity of human experiences than the professions themselves.
Wellbeing and performance are often interconnected. Supporting one can influence the other, making it difficult to separate the athlete from the person behind the athlete.
Professional titles, qualifications, and training matter, but they only tell part of the story. Understanding how a practitioner works and whether their approach aligns with your needs may be equally important.
Regardless of profession, some of the strongest predictors of positive outcomes are relational. Feeling understood, respected, and able to speak openly may matter more than the persons professional title.
Rather than asking, "Do I need a sport psychologist or a therapist?", a more helpful question may be, "Who is best placed to understand my experience and support the changes I want to make?"
A Reflection For Practitioners If you are a sport psychologist reading this article, it may be worth pausing to consider some of the tensions that emerge when we genuinely embrace a humanistic perspective. Take a moment to think about a client, athlete, or performer you have worked with recently and ask yourself:
Now consider the broader context surrounding that difficulty and ask yourself:
For many of us, the answer may be that these factors are deeply interconnected, which can create an interesting tension within sport psychology. On one hand, contemporary practice increasingly recognises the importance of athlete wellbeing, holistic development, and understanding the person behind the performer. On the other, many sport psychology training pathways continue to place greater emphasis on performance, consultation, behaviour change, and psychological skills than on therapeutic practice itself. If we accept that athletes cannot always separate performance from the rest of their lives, should we expect practitioners to do so? This is not an argument that all sport psychologists should become therapists, nor that every performance concern requires therapeutic intervention. However, it does invite reflection on the role of therapeutic competencies within contemporary sport psychology. Take a moment to ask yourself:
And if these experiences regularly influence performance, wellbeing, and participation, what place should therapeutic training occupy within the future development of the profession? There may be no simple answers to these questions. However, they may represent some of the most important conversations facing sport psychology as it continues to evolve. |
Considering Sport Psychology Support?
If you're currently exploring sport psychology support and would like to discuss whether we could be the right fit for your needs, we offer a free initial consultation with no financial commitment. This provides an opportunity to ask questions, discuss your goals, and get a sense of how our team works before deciding whether to continue.
Whether you choose to work with us or another practitioner, I hope this article has helped you feel more confident in making an informed decision.
Academic References
Andersen, M. B. (Ed.). (2005). Sport psychology in practice. Human Kinetics.
Flückiger, C., Del Re, A. C., Wampold, B. E., & Horvath, A. O. (2018). The alliance in adult psychotherapy: A meta‐analytic synthesis. Psychotherapy, 55(4), 316–340.
Horvath, A. O., Del Re, A. C., Flückiger, C., & Symonds, D. (2011). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 9–16.
Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 21(2), 95–103.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person: A therapist's view of psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.
Schinke, R. J., Stambulova, N. B., Si, G., & Moore, Z. (2018). International Society of Sport Psychology position stand: Athletes’ mental health, performance, and development. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 16(6), 622–639
Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Watson, J. C., Harris, B. S., & Baillie, P. (2020). Ethical issues impacting the profession of sport psychology. In G. Tenenbaum & R. C. Eklund (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (4th ed., pp. 751–772). Wiley

_pdf.png)
